By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo on 14 November 2016
Edit Thread
JEMC said:
onionberry said:

Dear, everything  you said, I know, I have to explain that to him but he would not understand. Other thing, I'm talking about efficiency when you compare pascal with amd's old architecture on the ps4 and xbox. put two gpus with the same power, one from amd's old architecture and one from Nvidia's new architecture, and the new one from nvidia is going to have an advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption. 

You're the one that used those figures and then compared them with the Switch .

And sure, Nvidia is more efficient than AMD, but we're talking about a device that will consume 15, maybe up to 20W in a best case scenario while the competing machines (PS4 Slim & XboxOne S) use more than 3x that power and are build in the same manufacturing process. Not even Nvidia is that efficient.

And let's not forget that, while Maxwell or Pascal can do certain tasks better than AMD's Tahiti, the latest can also do certain tasks better than what Nvidia has.

Just have on mind that PS4Slim/XB1s have AMD tech from 2012, while Switch has Nvidia tech most likely from 2016, so comparing consumptions of different tech from different period doesn't make too much sense. Also Switch can easily consume 20W or more in docked mode. So yes, we can definatly say that Switch will have advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption compared to real power of hardware.