By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

pokoko said:
I don't really get what you're saying, exactly.

Well, ironically...

The big difference would be that some types of games have fallen out of favor and been replaced by other types of games.

.....and...
The only real difference I see is that some types of games get a lot more exposure, now, though that's more because of consumer preference.
^^^^Is half of what I was trying to say haha. I tend to chain arguments together and create a blurry big picture

 

Teeqoz said:

Naaah, I think the problem is people are just looking at chart toppers, when the reality is that there is a lot of fun, varied content

Really, I can't disagree with you, Veknoid or Nautilus. You all raise good points. The way I see it, like Pokoko said, is that consumer preference created a market that appears a lot less diverse than what it once was. And like you said, there is still varied content, but it is not at the top of the charts like it once was.

What I would like to see is a more balanced gaming market, where all games can thrive despite their diversities. This is how I feel it was in the PS1 era



#1 Amb-ass-ador