NVIDIA CEO about Switch: “it was such a ground-breaking design”

[onionberry]

JEMC said:

onionberry said:

no, but considering that ps4 and xbox one have 1.84 tf and 1.31 and those are an old architecture, not polaris, and considering that both consoles have mobile cpus it's not that hard for the switch to be on par or just a bit behind because Nvidia is using their new architecture with more efficiency. Also, 0 load times, thanks to cartridge and 0 game installation (thankfully!). And you can't expect a tablet with the power of a ps4 pro or a xbox one scorpio for an affordable price because that's a fantasy.

Please, stop using the TFlops like that.

Nvidia has an advantage over AMD because their drivers are better when games run in DX11, and the situation is reversed when games run in DX12, even on older AMD architectures.

But none of that matters, because unless you're Microsoft, you can't use Direct X when developing for a console, so all that talk is useless.

Dear, everything  you said, I know, I have to explain that to him but he would not understand. Other thing, I'm talking about efficiency when you compare pascal with amd's old architecture on the ps4 and xbox. put two gpus with the same power, one from amd's old architecture and one from Nvidia's new architecture, and the new one from nvidia is going to have an advantage in terms of efficiency and power consumption.