Why is UC4 considered a better game than Rise of the Tomb Raider?

[S.T.A.G.E.]

DonFerrari said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

You're not getting what I am saying. Dead Pool is great because all of the factors that made it genuine was due to the writing being only for adults. Its the only way they could freely write up the script that embodied the spirit of the character. They did not water down the  movie. In games when a game is made to test a person in a certain type of way, to water it down is to kill the true meaning of what that game is.

As I said, your issue is that you want to be in the club, but you dont care about the principle of what the game is. What makes Dark Souls great isnt the storymode, but rather the grueling gameplay and bossses and sparsely seen campfire save spots. This game is for gamers who have a never say die attitude. They keep coming back even after they have to turn the game off and come back. The euphoria of beating the game is because it was one of the toughest many have ever faced.

When I was growing up when I went to the arcade all of the kids played Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter, but when Killer Instinct came out only a handful of players mastered that game while others watched in awe. They would try to learn the game, but it was deeper and harder to grasp than MK and Street FIghter. In the end...they were what made up the audience. KI made enough money to be considered a profitable game but was never a fan favorite franchise.  It was a cult classic. This is also due to the fact that it was exclusive to arcades and Nintendo. 

You dont get an option for easy because if you had an easy mode you wouldnt be playing Dark Souls. You can only demand harder difficulty which comes with new game plus.

I love to be considered idiot, but ok.

Have you ever considered that to your level of skill the game is challenging as is? Having the easier option (and it doesn't need to be dumbed down, sometimes very few minor adjustments could keep the soul of the game but still be accessible and on comparable hard challenge to you that is for other players) while for some other guys it still is quite easy since they can speedrun the game and finish it with initial equip. Still those guy accept you there and don't demand that the game lose the equips and other things they don't use.

Several folks complain VG nowadays is too easy and mention autosave, excess of items, etc... Guess what, you can still challenge yourself by restarting a game if you are hit once, or killed once, don't pick up the items, etc. You don't need to push your elitism feeling towards others.

You're not an idiot and I never suggested such. An easy option for Dark Souls...makes it no longer dark souls . For me the game is challenging...actually very challenging. I hadnt had my rear whipped like that since first playing the Witcher 2. The point of this game is for you to die numerous times.  Its not about elitism. Its about accepting the diversity of certai n types of games. I was introduced to dark souls because my friend couldnt beat it and gave it to me out of frustration. Just saying. The primacy concept of the game is to play it and survive it the way its meant to be played. Thats all I am saying. Its not about elitism, but rather more for more headstrong gamers who like to push their limits.

I have no issues with devs putting easy modes in most games. The majority of the market is casual, but this game was not made for casuals.