Dryden on 28 June 2007
| ioi said: It is, 20 votes. And there are a lot more than 20-30 people voting but yes the way to improve it all is to vote and encourage others to come and vote - the move votes we get the better the quality of the information |
Is there a method to weight voting towards the middle to reduce the effect of fanboy tampering, such as throwing out 10% of the total votes off of both the bottom and top end? The method used over at boardgamegeek is to give every game 100 votes based on the average of all user submitted votes for all games (~5.5). This drastically reduces the effect of padding. Just a thought ...
I like the system so far, but I think it's too early to criticize and the game list isn't really that out of whack. Time and more votes will eventually balance the ratings out.
