curl-6 on 10 November 2016
| bonzobanana said: I'm not going to deny the frame rate issue but the whole game engine is far more ambitious with proper collision detection, far more realistic graphics, more happening in the game world and a decent physics engine. It's hugely impressive. Xenoblade doesn't strive at all for realism, its single goal seems to be impressive graphics but with terrible pop-in and a simplistic engine. Reminding me of Monster Hunter somewhat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fbYyMq4cGU The only similar open world game on wii u is watch dogs and not only does that fail to surpass 360 and PS3 graphics but it does so with lower frame rates, horrible slow loading and what can only be described as disc drive destroying never stopping disc access because of the lack of hard drive. |
GTA5 is less demanding than XCX in a number of ways though; its world is not as large, and you cannot move through it as quickly and seamlessly as you can in XCX. As such, GTA5 is less RAM intensive, since it doesn't need to have as much data in active memory at any one time. Which is a necessity, as it has to operate on consoles with less than 500MB of RAM available for games, while XCX has the relative luxury of 1GB.
And a poorly made, low priority port is never a good indication of a system's capabilities. Bayonetta 1 for example looks and runs like deep fried vomit on PS3, but that does not prove PS3 is far weaker than 360.
