By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
StarDoor said:
SuaveSocialist said:

1) The UN.
2) Like I said, "logic" has little to do with your statement.
3) Thanks for providing that definition.  Looks like you glossed over "based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity".  Your 'whites-only country' is clearly anathemic to the definition you provided.  So, you can refer to 2) and then to 1). 

Case closed.

1.) Do you have a link or not?

2.) Do you have an argument or not?

3.) OK, imagine 50 million white people moving into Uganda, a country of 37 million. They would be the new majority of the country and have a stranglehold on politics, and the former Ugandan population would no longer have its sovereignty. But that would be fine with you, right? Because immigration is a human right.

"Equal rights and fair equality of opportunity" is not the same thing as "right to invade a country that belongs to a different people."

1.  See previous reply.  Follow instructions in 3)
2.  See previous reply.  Follow instructions in 3)
3.  See previous reply.  Follow instructions in 3)

You've already shown your entire position to be self-defeating and illogical.  Case closed.  I'm ignoring you now.