mrstickball on 28 June 2007
Look at it this way:
It's kind of like an anti-IMDB sort of thing. Numbers are going to be really eschewed right now since we might only have 20-30 people voting on games. However, if it ever becomes large enough to where the numbers are 1000+ reviews, then we can get some strong median averages, and really get to the whole ability of having good user-rated game rankings.
Something like this just takes time.
IMO, a "minimum votes" should be established (atleast 10 or 20) before a title is considered on the top list, like what Gamerankings and IMDB do.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
