A lot of people are ignoring that Tomb Raider has no multiplayer!!! That alone should put Uncharted a few marks over Tomb Raider. At the end of the day you can't push across your opinions as fact, some will prefer U4 and some will prefer RotTR and you can only discuss you reasons why one is better than the other and even go into it deeper and break it down into categories like some people have done.
But it's a fact that U4 has MP while RotTR doesn't. It's not an opinion and it's a fact. You can argue that you don't care about MP but if you look at it objectively it's still missing in RotTR. So no matter how close the campaign modes are, U4 has a huge chunk of game that is completely missing in RotTR.
Ultimately gamers and reviewers have spoken and if you can't handle that, just get over it. I swear this is like the tenth U4 vs RotTR thread I've seen.
RotTR looks like to be a solid game although I probably won't play it. I had Tomb Raider reboot with PS Plus and only played 30 mins before I got bored. But from what I can see TR and RotTR are both good games and I wouldn't smash somebody's opinion if they prefer those games. But I don't think people can argue with the fact that U4 is more of a complete package.
What OP doesn't seem to understand is how he's rubbing people up the wrong way. People will prefer U4 and to be told "I cant see a single thing that makes it a better game than Rise of the Tomb Raider" is only just going to piss people off. It's just ignorance. It's not even a well set up thread, no reasons are given why one is better than the other.
