Miyamotoo said:
We know Halo 5 sold 4m on instal base of 23m, how much will sale on same instal base like current PS4 of 45m!?
So you saying in that case Halo 3 would have around 100% attach rate!? :D Of Course that isn't case, fact is higher instal base means higher posible buyers for evre game on that platform that basicle means higher sales for evre game on platfrom, lower instal base means lower sales for evre game on platform. Why do you think evre multiplatform game sold better on PS4 instead of XB1 and in most cases sales around double while sale of mulitiplaform games were identical on PS3/Xbox 360, because PS4 has double instal base and double potential buyers for every game on that platform, while PS3 and Xbox360 had identical instal base. |
It could be near 100%, why not? Do you have anything to disprove it? On less than 20M consoles it sold 12M SW, it's much more likely to have it selling 8M on 10M userbase (higher attach ratio) than 50M on 85M userbase (using your constant attach ratio). But you keep headed on the same illogical approach.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."