Miyamotoo said:
No, because you comparing platforms from different generations and difrent games, its easier to compare sales of some same multiplatform game on consoles of same generation, than sales of some exlusive games in difrent generation. Also if you need more evidence, look at sales of multi platform games on PS4 and XB1 and you will see that on PS4 sales of those same games are around double than they are on XB1, because of bigger twice instal base. In this case I talking about attach rate only for U4 on PS4 and only about Halo 5 on XB1, look at current attach rate of those games, and you will see that in year-two attach rate will similar to current. |
Ok, I see... so you will only consider the data that confirm your bias. No problem, your perception of reality won't change reality itself.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







