By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
coolbeans said:
DonFerrari said:

So if you aren't meaning those are sold numbers how do you want to compare it to sold numbers.

I'm beginning to question whether or not you follow the context of my response.  The entire point of my comment you quoted is in the confidence of my claim of H5 having more digital sales than UC4.  

1.) Do you also believe that to--currently--be true?

2.) If not, what points can you bring up that rebut the claim?

Using the 5 million (sold to customers) number O' Connor was specifically used to suggest we could get some educated guess at the rate of physical/digital (at the time).  I'm totally down with seeing contrary points that may suggest my claim is incorrect though.  And I'd hope it sticks to the points/argument b/c my patience is running thin for bullshit snark doesn't contribute anything to the discussion.

That is what you don't understand. We aren't believing that 5M is sold to customers. And we already got aquamarine (who have access to numbers) that digital ratio is 25-30% not 50%.

So no, I don't think there is any data that can determine Halo 5 had more digital sales than UC4 to any significant degree (and beware that VGC count bundle sales no matter if digital or physical the same way).

Your point is totally hold on your own opinion or other people wishes... we already had doze threads on this subject close to Halo5 release when people were trying to cover for less than expected sales.

And I would appreciate if you watch your tone and keep the forum civil.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."