Ouroboros24 said:
Yeah you did, although sarcastically. "Yes, let's follow this line of though and prohibit Nintendo fans on here making arguments for Nintendo." Sure it does. It filters out all the low level partners. The guys that can't follow direction from a business like Nintendo. We've all heard the how strict they are with their employees. A person can't even be on a podcast without nintendo going all crazy about what they said. To keep that tight leash with people, it takes real dedication. Like i said, they don't want people selling their games for them, they have thier own marketing. |
Pardon me but it is not the job of any pundit, reviewer, or impressions giver to follow a corporation's instructions when doing their job, YouTube or otherwise. And on top of that, I would say 95% of what Nintendo does isn't within their rights, it's a major overstepping. Because they use content ID, which is a bs system that literally just takes money with no legal obligation by Nintendo to prove their claim of copyrighg infringement and no recourse whatsoever for the party harmed. It's bull, it was always bull, and it will always be bull. If Nintendo wants to be a prick with its copyrights, it should have to use the legal channels as intended and incur some risk.
And as I pointed out earlier, this only filters out positivity since major negative videos WILL happen. And it means some of the biggest reviewers and pundits don't bring them up. And it pisses off the fanbases of those who are shafted by this. It has done them no good whatsoever.
