By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GribbleGrunger said:

DonFerrari said:

Sorry, I was just quick replying to OP and hadn't read posts yet.

But we had some threads of people saying Nintendo wouldn't ever show what wasn't already commited to launch on Switch and that graphics would be better in the next flow of games because those were only ports from WiiU.

So they are 6 months from launch and doesn't have a single show piece of a game even after 18 months of leaks? Well we can certainly compare that to PS4 and X1 reveal. And now we truly now why nintendo won't talk more about the system until 2017 and why they decided to launch this teaser close to Pro launch.

 

 

I spent the whole Skyrim advert thread saying 'this isn't on Nintendo' and went to great length to explain why I thought, logically, it wasn't on them. In this thread I get accused of having an agenda because I've conceded this is turning into a cock up. What can you say ... ?

Well, you know that we are all Nintendo haters that can't see a positive Nintendo news that we need to dismiss it, it must be that, there isn't any other explanation.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."