By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 24 October 2016
Edit Thread
Darc Requiem said:
DonFerrari said:
Well, that certainly helped their bottom line.

In before, if this was Sony there would be things like the complainings about building being sold.

Not an equivalent situation. Sony is a much larger company, with more employees, and massive debt. Nintendo is much smaller company with huge cash reserves.

Yes, it isn't the same situation. But a lot of those posts were saying Sony wouldn't have posted profits without the sale of the buildings, and this would be a similar case going by the last years. And of course Nintendo case is a lot more positive, even more if they invest in what Miyamotoo posted and they generate profit.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."