RolStoppable said:
You forgot to mention that Nelson, Eifert and Gostkowski combined for only 4.8 points, so it's not like everything went my way. Don't blame me for starting Bengals when they were playing vs. the only winless team in the league or starting Ware against the Saints defense when Charles was out. I mean, come on. If such decisions didn't lead to fantasy points, then there would be no need whatsoever to put any thought into anything. You started WRs for both of the struggling New York teams. Anyone could have told you that that is going to be quite a high risk. Regardless, I don't get why you feel so down at this point. You trail by 34 points, but Johnson averaged 30 points over the past two games while Graham averaged 10. That means it's far from over. Seattle@Arizona isn't necessarily a defensive slugfest because these two teams faced 2 each other in high-scoring affairs as well. |
I'm not "blaming" you for anything. Just saying that you got some pretty helpful performances from some not necessarily expected places. Ya, Nelson underperformed a lot, but Eifert had what, his first game back? No wonder he's rusty, and not into the offense. And Gostkowski missed 1 PAT, so it's not like he left a bunch of points on the table for you-
And yes, technically Johnson and Graham could still pull it out for me, but my recollection of last year is that the Seahawks totally shut Johnson down, and that was when the rest of the Cardinals offense was actually more helpful than they have been so far this year, so idk how great his prospects are in this game. Hell I'm not even sure I WANT him to have a great game, cus above all else, I want the Seahawks to win. And Graham, well I think he'll be solid, but unlikely to ball out like crazy. I'm guessing they'll combine for maybe 20 points tonight
