se7en7thre3 said: iAs you may know, the X2 pascal chip is touted at 1.5 tf, fp16 (half precision) so 750 gf ,fp32 (single prec.) is the max. Considering Nvidia >>>>> AMD flops, performance wise brings it closer to XB1. |
nVidia's flops aren't any better than AMD's, I assume you think that because AMD has more flops and nVidia's GPU's outperform them still? Well here is the kicker. There is more to a GPU's capabilities than flops.
se7en7thre3 said: This lines up exactly with what Emily declared the entire time , about NX performing similar to XB1 but power comparison being a stretch, etc. |
The Switch/NX falls far short of the Xbox One's capabilities, there is more to performance than flops and Tegra is a chip based on compromises to meet certain power targets.
se7en7thre3 said: But I think the worst case scenario, regarding 3rd parties, NS will be a 540port system, displacing Vita. |
It will likely be a 720P and under device, it's likely to be ROP/Texturing starved, it will also likely have less geometry throughput than the Xbox One, certainly less bandwidth and texture/pixel fillrate... It doesn't matter what clocks you run on it, it's not likely to have the edge.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--