By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
burninmylight said:
Game_God said:

Do you see now what was the point I was trying to explain?

http://gonintendo.com/stories/267152-nintendo-stock-falls-6-5-after-switch-reveal

I thought the Wii U could sell well when it was released, we now know the harsh reality, this Switch thing, I really can't see it flying of the shelves... I always root for Nintendo success, but the path they are walking with this thing... I wouldn't take a single step down that path & certainly wouldn't lend $$ to someone walking it!

Dude, I've always seen your point. Not agreeing =/= missing the point.

Stock falls 6.5 percent, whoopity-doo. Wake me  up when it falls by double digits and stays down. Those shares will likely make a slow climb back to the median, and when S/M and the Mario runner release, they will easily eclipse that. That's when you would want to sell your shares. If you were a stockholder, make decisions like a businessman, not an overreactive gamer.

So you understanding the point and disagreeing needs a hell lot of improvement.

To counter his idea of being an shareholder he should sell off his shares you put a link of shares going up, that when countered with shares going down you avoid the point saying that it shall (your opinion) rise again when the games release.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."