Rankstrail said:
What you say is perfectly fine by me IF it will have CURRENT GEN QUALITY HOME CONSOLE GAMES (MULTIPLATFORM), I don't think Nvidia should be selling the GTX 1080 for excellent performance in demanding games if all the people could simply use a Tegra processor that costs a fifth instead that consumes very little Watts and doesn't even need a heatsink and a fan. Will the majority of people believe it will have all the AAA home console games? (or capable of). Can you really call this "home" console? (not a real question, more like an invite to think careful about this particular aspect, I know well Nintendo markets it at a "home" console, but every PR guy in every company tells lies) PS: I really agree with you about the WiiU marketing problem, you nailed it in few words. |
Yeah, I get what you say. But I think (and this is, probably, just semantics or free interpretation of what a home console is xD) that power is not what makes a home console. I mean WiiU was really underpowered and it's still a home console. Hell, NES is still a home console right now imo haha. The Switch is actually a home portable console. Or a portable home console. It doesn't really matter actually, it can do both. As long as you can plug it into your TV, playing with several controllers with your friends/family/whoever, is for me a home console. So, yeah, I think it's just semantics.