Video: Bill Clinton accuser Juanita Broaddrick relives brutal rapes.

[Final-Fan]

Azuren said:

Final-Fan said:

The post you are quoting mentions specific things in my previous post that call for an answer which you did not address in your reply.  Are you being purposefully disingenuous or is it accidental? 

Oh, I'm not addressing them because neither of us are going to convince the other of anything. I find Hillary's incompetence more important of an issue than you do Trump's social ineptitude, and we're not going to say one another no matter how articulate the argument. 

You know nothing of my position if you think my opposition to Trump is based on his "social ineptitude".  This alone illustrates that your perception of our relative positions, and their intractability, is flawed.  I honestly have no idea what you think justifies your claim that Hillary Clinton would be incompetent at being POTUS compared to Trump.  To be fair, though, social ineptitude on Trump's level does factor into his incompetence as POTUS. 

But my objection to your reply isn't even limited to Trump vs. Clinton.  A large segment of my post was talking about their contest in the context of our current electoral system.  I made an argument that I believe applies to any contest between our two major parties in that system given the current state of the minor parties.  You completely ignored this.  You also ignored the question of whether you were going to vote for Trump (versus no-one or a third party), but you've since implied the answer to that one already. 

P.S.  I'd like to address your statement, "I only match levels of convincing, so blame your own argument for that."  This implies that if you were faced with what you saw as a pathetic and foolish argument, you would respond with an equally pathetic and foolish response.  Why?