By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
axumblade said:
JRPGfan said:

I honestly dont think reviewers give scores based on costs. Not sure if they should either.

Its up to the consumer if they want to buy a game at certain costs.

To be honest, the issues people were having were the same issues that people have with Bethesda games that somehow garner high reviews despite having a lot of glitches and long loading times. Things easily passed off because it was a known fact Bethesda would fix the problem. 

Except that bugs in a game the size of bethesda one are quite different from this one and the ignoring the bugs are more due to the love they have for the content, which doesn't see to have happened on this



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."