Gears of War 4 Xbox One/PC Multiplayer/Horde Mode Analysis + Frame-Rate Test

[Mr Puggsly]

Captain_Yuri said:

Mr Puggsly said:

I don't think optimization needs to be ideal for a port to be considered, "good." As long as its playable product on reasoanble specs with better graphics, I don't think there needs to be so much complaining.

You can argue FH3 isn't where it should be on a 970 or 390, but its gonna look and play better than the X1 version. So lets not pretend those specs are just giving X1 visuals and performance.

If that game only intrigued becuase it was new... well I don't have a response to that. Just go playing something else and I look forward to inevitably seeing you in other threads just to complain about performance in new games. That will never get old...

I think it does. We do have quite a few other words that can be used for "playable" like Acceptable but not ideal optimization or Minimal optimization. Good optimization while cards that are more than twice as powerful struggling to only hit 60fps at 1080p doesn't sound good to me.

Does it though?

TL:DR 390 goes below 30 fps and in order to get the 30fps lock that the x1 has, they had to turn down the AA settings to below (0x) what the x1 had (4x). And the 970 isn't exactly performing well either. Both the x1 and PCs are running at 1080p Native.

And well, complaining is what I do when I have a game that isn't very well optimized to my standards and no new games/exclusives came out that interest me. And I do/will complain until they fix this stuff and I will praise when they do. If I order a pizza and its cold, wouldn't I complain about that? I would bitch until they either gave me a fresh one or a refund. 

I didn't say FH3 is where it should be, but is it perfectly playable on 390? Absolutely, even with settings above X1. It will get patched as well.

I think what I'm trying to say is... we don't care about your cold pizza. Have you praised MS for improving the performance in their PC releases? I only see complaining.