Forza Horizon 3 Metacritic/Review thread - current meta: 91

[Chris Hu]

JRPGfan said:

walsufnir said:

As if Horizon 2 was that bad and we didn't have discussions about metacritic and scores in general before.

It's hard to determine whether a 90+ metascore means a focus on quality, or let's say: a score below 90 means having *not* a focus on quality.

Thats true,... other parts obviously play a part.

However I feel like its been said of alot of xbox exclusives, that they release and lack polish, are buggy ect.

Even for a rushed launch game Forza Motorsports 5 wasn't too bad its just lacked content I still think it was better then the first two Motorsports games I do miss some of the custom cars that where in the first two games though like the Hennessey Viper and the Lingenfelder and Gulstrand Corvette.  Forza Horizon 2 was pretty polished and didn't really have any mayor bugs.  The only thing that was somewhat annoying was the road trips and more of the map could have been used for races.  Horizon 3 might still have some road trips but the will be a lot less frequently since the map is broken up into four areas and not six differnt locations and a central festival that doesn't have any events but you have to travel back to after you done events in three different locations.  Also since you now can make up your own races more of the map should be used then it was in two.