Azuren said:
Okay, you're done. Hillary Clinton is awful and you're just awful at proving it, especially when it's just simply too easy.
Hillary Clinton compromised national security. She lied on numerous occasions about it. Then got caught. When she was caught, she claimed not ignorance, but incompetence. The person that many want to be our nation's most powerful figure is so mind-blowingly awful at what she does that she couldn't even pay attention for a 15 minute briefing on how classified information is labeled.
So now we're stuck with two potential characters in Hillary; the one that she wants us to believe is an incompetent fool unfit to run a country, and the one that might be hosting become that facade whole planning who knows what.
Full disclosure, I don't want Trump to be president. I did at one point early in the race, but he's become increasingly hostile towards people that he doesn't need to be hostile towards. He's opened his mouth and awful, awful things have come out. But you know what?
We know what kind of person he is. He's not a wildcard, he's just a bad one.
Hillary, on the other hand, is a card equally bad (but in a different way)... Unless she's actually a maniac. So I just don't care to sit by and listen to people compare her and Trump, only to act like one is better. They're two different flavors of shit; diarrhea and green diarrhea. Stop acting like your political party chose the less shit candidate, because it didn't. |
@ bolded
How many politicians do you think are equally incompetent and have also compromised national security but just haven't been caught (at least in public)? I suspect there's a scary number of politicians who are equally as incompetent in that regard.
