By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GOWTLOZ said:
Captain_Yuri said:

The argument isnt the cost of the PC though... The Argument is that a top of the line PC isn't required to run at max settings. Tomb Raider isn't exactly a CPU bound game either. You can pair up an i3 and bam.

A GPU would bottleneck way before a CPU ever will for this game. (At least for high resolutions anyway)

Again, Ps4Pro > PC as far as bang for buck goes.

This is running the game at 1080p, at 4K it would be a different story with an i3. A sixth gen i5 is good enough for it though it adds a lot to the cost of a PC.

Resolution doesn't affect CPU performance to a noticable degree (none at all at most times)... Hence why no one benchmarks CPUs at 4k because the GPU will bottleneck virtually all of them. Cause at most, it will increase the FoV and have slightly more objects in the screen but not so much that it will affect the framerate and performance to a care worthy amount otherwise we would have endless benchmarks about it. There are of course, exceptions to every rule but Tomb Raider is not one of them. Google it



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850