Hynad said:
Captain_Yuri said:
It does and also a 1060 is able to play max with 4k native near 30fps on average. A 1060 is a $250 card. Turn a few settings down and you will still get better visual quality than a ps4Pro at a smooth 30fps. No upscaling and other stuff.
Now don't mistake what I am trying to say. Ps4Pro is the best $400 value that anyone will be able to get and that value for performance cannot be beaten without making some weird arse choices. But people don't really need a top of the line PC to get same performance/visual levels as a ps4pro.
But we will see what the final differences will be like once more and more games comes out.
|
Your graph doesn't tell the whole story.
What CPU is paired with those GPU?
|
The argument isnt the cost of the PC though... The Argument is that a top of the line PC isn't required to run at max settings. Tomb Raider isn't exactly a CPU bound game either. You can pair up an i3 and bam.
A GPU would bottleneck way before a CPU ever will for this game. (At least for high resolutions anyway)
Again, Ps4Pro > PC as far as bang for buck goes.
