By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom said:
bigtakilla said:

But if the question was do you like fruits, and I say he roughly likes all of them, I'm not wrong just because you don't like peaches.

Visually they are going to be the same experience, which means no major upgrades to the graphics. They can be "improved", but that is a very broad term. 

"It's like if I said "I like fruits, but I hate peaches."  And you said " see, he likes fruits"."

I just wrote that part wrong.  What I meant to say was, 

"It's like if I said "I like fruits, but I hate peaches."  And you said " see, he likes fruits, so he must like peaches."  The point, which I clarified with the next example anyway, is that you're focusing on the first clause of the sentence, and essentially ignoring the second.

You're also changing the quote.  It does not say that they will visually be the same experience.  You added the word visually on your own.  It says the game will be the same experience, but (there's that key word) the graphics will be improved.   And, the word improved wasn't even used in the first place, that's another made up addition.  Here's what was actually said.

"@ArcadeGirl64 Yup, Aounuma said same to me. Same experience. Just different visuals."

Improved is a reasonable inference, but it's important that the actual word used was different.  Different does not mean the same experience, it means the exact opposite of that.  I'm pretty sure you're not going to aruge that "different" means somehow means "same". Clearly, the implication was that the games were the same in other regards (sound, gameplay) but not visually.

So, fear not.  Your curse of being right has been broken.

I ain't saying visually it'll be the same experience either.