By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Conina on 11 September 2016
Edit Thread
Intrinsic said:
Conina said:

The ONLY zoomed picture in this whole thread was the last close-up of laras neck&shoulder, the other ones were 1:1-sections of the 4K-pictures for the people here, who are even too lazy to open the 4k-pictures in fullscreen (and even there you have to maximize the picture on a 1080p-display) to see the differences and just took a quick look in the forum display and "see no difference"

I think you  and Peh are really missing the point of this thread. I'm not saying there ISN'T a differrence. Yes, 4kc will never look as good as a native 4k. Thats never been in debate.

But the point is simple, is 4kc providing a good enough imporovememnt over 1080p? Will that difference be something that will look sooo bad and detract from the overall I at a glance in comparison to native 4k under normal use situations? Is or should pushing more pixels natively be proposed over pushing pixels "smarter" with less a hit to resources while still achieving results that are better than 1440p which just up till september 7th seemed to have been perfect and ok for most gamers?

I'm not missing your point. Your point in all these threads is that the graphic fidelity of a PS4 Pro is fantastic and that everything above are diminishing returns not worth the extra money.

Until a few days ago your point was for over two years that the graphic fidelity of a PS4 is fantastic and that everything above are diminishing returns not worth the extra money.