Andrew House: We've seen that video streaming is more popular

[Machiavellian]

Flouff said:

Machiavellian said:
As we all know, when you do not have a feature, its always because its in your best interest. When the competitor has a feature its in their best interest. When all is said and done, being the big boy on the market means you dictate what you customers will have and accept as features. When you are the company playing catch up, you add everything you can to differentiate your product from the leader. This is why I like the underdog system more than the leader. You get stuff that the dominate system will not offer because they do not have to.

I know what you want to say, i choose my systems on personnal tastes, but ou seem to completly forgot the software part of it. If the underdog has a player but less games of your taste, what's the point ?

When it comes to games I find that all systems usually have games that I want to play.  This is the reason I have a X1, PS4 and WiiU.  All the systems get play time within my household because each one have games my family wants to play.  When the whole war of systems started I have always said I like MS in the catchup position then the dominate position.  The reason why is that MS works much harder to get market share when they are behind then when they are in front.  Hell Sony is the same way and if the ecosystem is competitive it would be good if both systems were neck and neck then we would see both sides strive to outdo the the other.  I really do not have any preference for any one system, I just like to play games.