RolStoppable said:
Let me try again. When I said that they failed to close out games, I meant that they lost games that they should have won. I was talking about games where the Jaguars were in the lead and then ended up losing. An example that works for this is the London game they had against the Bills. The Jaguars were up by three scores at one point, but then the offense and defense couldn't pull off what was necessary to play it home. In the end they still won the game because of a bad penalty call or a bad non-call (either way, the refs messed up), but they weren't that lucky in a few other games. Of course they got slaughtered in a few of their losses too, but more experience in how to win a football game could have earned them a better record. Last year they didn't look like the usual Jaguars who win three or four games in the whole season if the stars align for them. They were a good bit better, so what I think the analysts are banking on is that the team can take the next step this year. Win more of the winnable games which might be good enough in the abysmal AFC South. |
Hmm, might just be the sample size of the games I saw then. I don't exactly make a habit of seeking out Jags games. And it's true the South is weak. Also, the AFC South sucks.