| fatslob-:O said: I don't think Trump will entirely subdue corruption in the office. I criticize Clinton's corruption because she's granted higher power than a citizen like Trump is and she also decides to be A LOT less transparent about it. LOL, she was desperate enough to avoid persecution by pinning her email fiasco on someone else. Just goes to show you how much of a coward she can be and that's not a favourable trait from a leader no matter how anyone spins it. FYI, I dislike for profit education and Trump University is no different but that's the customer's fault for getting into their own shenanigans if they don't research the crap they buy ... As for the link, the judges ruled that no legally binding contract was formed so that's the plaintiffs fault for not legally securing their own claimed property ... Trump couldn't have ever been corrupt at least not in the political sense according to Wikipedia because his power as a regular citizen means that he's practically infallible to such accusations currently whereas Clinton on the other hand was a senator for eight years and the secretary of services for four years who was currying favours for the Clinton Foundation donors ... I don't know if I am totally getting rid of corruption because of how big the government already is but I'm willing to pick a clean slate over a scarred one and I especially respect our power in a democracy to replace the scourge or defecates who's interests are funded by others. Trump maybe a con artist for all I know but Clinton is a fucking shyster that continues to get a free pass ... |
Fatslob, you are making excuses. Trump is a corrupt business man. He is not just a con artist, his word is about as wortless as they come. He lies like he doesn't know the truth and he cares absolutly nothing about who he hurts. You really need to do your homework on Trump because it seems you are only looking at the TV and branded Trump instead of the actual man and his character which is well documented over the years. There is absolutly nothing different from Trump then any other corrupt politician currently in office. Instead you are looking to just put another one in office that has a different name and gender then the one that is running for the Democratic ticket.
The article I posted as I mentioned shows that Trump will promise people anything then renenged on his agreements once he gets what he want. You also forget in that article that he had to settle mutiple times within that lawsuit but the real problem is how it went down not what the judge decided. Saying that the letters he sent to those investors are not legal binding agreements does not asolve Trump from using underhanded means to get investment only to have no plans of following through. Does not not sound exactly like his run for president. He is promissing a hell of a lot of stuff but if you cannot trust his word since it means nothing, how can you ever believe he will follow through.
If a person is corrupt going into government and its very clear that Trump is very corrupt business man. Hell he has over 5000 lawsuits against him on the very topic of the article I posted. Why would anyone think he will bring anything new. If anything the way he does business in the private sector he will bring eactly the same tactics in the public. Trump is 70 years old doing every dirty handed thing in business to get an edge and make a buck. Why would he ever change now and why would you believe just because he is not in politics he is a clean slate. It really does not add up or make sense. Corruption is corruption no matter how you convince yourself its different. If you want to go different then go totally different and go independant. I know this is the first year I am going independant and I suggest anyone who is against corruption think about making this a 3 party race instead of 2.
