By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Einsam_Delphin said:
BraLoD said:

What is so silly about my statement? The one (statement) I didn't even ever do. Please, be confrontational and explain me.

They announce a sandcastle pokémon, I dislike it, you extrapolate it to something that is on your own mind and only there, as if I said this means this gen is horrible compared to others and never happened before, or as if I said gen 1 or 2 were pits of creativity where everything made sense, or as if I said it's out of place with the lore or something else...

Seriously, you can't dislike anything related to Nintendo around here, nothing at all, or else...
Take it easy, stop being passive-aggressive, and don't put words in my mouth because you feel like being defensive when there wasn't ever even the need to be.

 

That's the Nintendo defense force for ya, they always believing dislike/hate is unjustified based on falsitys.

Excuse me?  You seem to have me confused for something else.  I've criticized Nintendo plenty and there are plenty of things they do that I find stupid (Wii U launch marketing), ignorant (the timing of and design of the new Paper Mario and Metroid franchises), cowardly (their head-in-the-sand WE DON'T COMPETE WITH MS/SONY! talk), ill informed (E3 2016), and overall just stupid choices (many in the past several years).  If you are going to accuse someone of being a defensive, illogical fanboy go look somewhere else.  

All I was getting at was  that normally the statement BraLod made is tied in with the idea that Pokemon has run out of ideas and the new gens have all these bad uncreative ideas.  What made me think this was "A sandcastle pokémon now? "  The Now implied that things were different than a previous time, hence the assumption.  If that's not what he meant, I am sorry.