By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dongo8 said:
JEMC said:

Given that Nvidia still hasn't said anything about Tegra 2 and there hasn't been any leaks about its performance (at least that I know, feel free to post them if you have seen them), talking about its performance is pure speculation, but going further and saying that it's not only more powerful than the PS4/X1 but on par with the newer models is simply wrong.

It's ok to be excited, but please let's keep this within what's reasonable.

I don't appreciate the attitude, multiple sites have reported this, and the exact specs in this here article: http://techfrag.com/2016/08/17/nintendo-nx-tegra-x2/

Don't knock me down if you can't back it up.

If my post seemed aggresive or disrespectful, please accept my appologies as that wasn't my intention.

That said, we're still in the same situation because that link of your says nothing about the performance of the Tegra X2. They said which ARM cores it will have, but it doesn't say anything about the frequency of those cores and what's the difference between the Denver 2 cores and other ARM products.

At the same time, while it will feature Pascal architecture instead of Maxwell, we don't know how many cores it will have and the frequency they'll run at.

Lastly, the article doesn't even claim that NX will use Tegra X2, it only says that a report (without stating which one or providing a link to read it) says that it will use it.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.