Who will provide the NX GPU?

[JEMC]

Pemalite said:

JEMC said:

The Tegra X1 is a good compromise as it allows devs to start working on a machine with ARM processors and GPU architectures like those found in current PCs.

Didn't realise I had an ARM CPU in my PC. ;)

I was talking about the GPU architecture found in the Tegra X1, and you know it

 

Miyamotoo said:

JEMC said:

You are mixing the stories. Form the Digital Foundry side of the article:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nintendo-nx-mobile-games-machine-powered-by-nvidia-tegra

"There's an additional wrinkle to the story too, albeit one we should treat with caution as it is single-source in nature with a lot of additional speculation on our part. This relates to the idea that the Tegra X1 in the NX development hardware is apparently actively cooled, with audible fan noise. With that in mind, we can't help but wonder whether X1 is the final hardware we'll see in the NX. Could it actually be a placeholder for Tegra X2? It's a new mobile processor Nvidia has in its arsenal and what's surprising about it is how little we actually know about it."

Only one of the dev kits has a fan, one, which is also the one used to speculate about NX using something more powerful than a Tegra X1 (and that confirms that those are not final dev kits).

How does one, from the undisclosed number of sources, dev unit becomes the standard? Oh, I know, internet speculation.

I dont mixing stores, beacue that I wrote this "Its speculated that is overclocked because NX X1 dev kit is actively cooled with with audible fan noise".

If one dev kit is like that, that means all dev kits at that time were same.

Are you f*cking serious?!

Only one dev kit had a fan, the others didn't. If you need a fan to cool whatever was inside that unit, you would need the same fan to cool the rest, and they didn't have it. Therefore, assuming that all the other dev kits featured an overclocked X1 (which is still your assumption) is completely wrong.