By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
Kirin_gaming said:

I'd be willing to believe it was Nvidia if it wasn't for this.

Nvidia doesn't downplay console margins just for the sake of downplaying them.The truth is that console deals would be negligible for a company as successful as Nvidia unless of course, they were on the winning end of the deal which this guess implies otherwise.In case you don't believe console deals even one that benefit both parties are negligible just take a look at AMD, they currently manufacture for all consoles yet they are in the shitter.Why would Nvidia want such deals? and even more so why would they want a losing deal?

I think point is that they want to enter console market even that doesn't give them big profit, just to be present there and maybe later some else also would consider their chips for their consoles/platforms.

 

But again what would the point of that be? I think We've already established that console deals barely make any difference in a company's revenue especially one like Nvidia.The big 3 already know that Nvidia exists, they already know that they have the strongest and most efficient GPUs but they come at a premium price.Nvidia recently came into many investors eyes, they are currently a rising star, they need more deals like those with tesla which can possibly bring them billions they need to keep high profits to maintain a positive image, and like I've said countless times a console deal would do very little for a company like Nvidia, not to mention that having a losing deal like those guesses say would ruin their current image with investors.why would Nvidia ruin their image just for a petty console deal which will only cause them loses? do you now see why I and many other people are skeptical?