SuaveSocialist said:
When the White House encouraged protests, it encouraged protests. Trump encouraged gun-nuts to do a deliberately ambiguous something. That's a dog whistle for assassination; this phenomenon isn't new (he's done it before, albeit for assault not murder) and people tend to answer the call sooner or later. Either Trump knows what he's doing and incited violence or he doesn't know what he's doing and incited violence. |
wat. He deliberately encouraged something ambigous? So he encouraged nothing, but now you're saying it's for assasination. I mean, I think a lot of things he says are dumb, but saying that people care about the 2nd Amendment can stop Hillary/Democrats from limiting/banning guns isn't a call for hit. It's reactions like this that make it so because you want to believe he's an evil, fascist sociopath.
Really, I could turn your entire answer around and make it about the other side using the same logic.
