Azuren said:
Soundwave said:
She had more votes than Bernie Sanders. That's the bottom line. A lot more at that.
Bernie Sanders supporters should more maganimous in defeat, Hilary supporters had every reason to act like sore losers after 2008, they didn't. They swallowed their pride and got behind candidate Obama. Take the loss, character is revealed in people not when they win but how they conduct themselves in a loss.
I don't see Hilary Clinton as evil to begin with, that's part of a smear campaign against her because she's not a charismastic candidate. She has a shrill voice.
But being a 67 year old woman who isn't the most savvy person on setting up an email server doesn't make you "evil". It's hilarious that Trump can do 20954949 different gaffes and still be seen as "about par" with Clinton who's never been shown to intentionally hurt someone and her big scandal is that she was careless with an email server. It's a laughable double standard actually.
Republicans throw shade at the Clintons because they are scared shit less of the Clintons, they tried to impeach him and thought for sure the American people would side with them because he got a blow job (oh noes!) but instead Clinton's job approval rating went even higher. They can't stand the Clintons because despite all their huffing and puffing about balancing the budget, Clinton is the only one who's ever actually done it. So they've been bracing for a Hilary Clinton presidential run for 20 years.
And the best they got on her is a bunch of fucking emails, the overwhelming majority of which weren't even classified. On the other end of the aisle you have a candidate retweeted Neo-Nazis. Like what the fuck is the perspective here even. These are supposed to be equivalent? Because they're not even close.
|
Stopped reading at the first statement because you don't seem to be comprehending anything. Enjoy dancing for the DNC.
|
Like I said character is revealed in how people handle a loss. It says a lot when someone behaves like a baby when they lose.
I'm fine with the DNC. If Bernie Sanders had 4 million votes I would have zero problem supporting him and I would tell Clinton supporters who were whining about losing the exact same thing.
You still haven't logically explained why if Clinton has the power to "rig" votes (to the tune of 4 million votes, lol), why she didn't throw herself an extra 500,000 votes in 2008, probably would've been enough then to beat Obama.
Fact is Bernie didn't run a campaign as good as Obama did in 2008. He didn't get as much support. And Hilary, like her or not, is a tough cookie to beat, Obama who routed two Republican challengers and would wipe the floor with Trump head to head, beat Hilary by the narrowest of margins.
