Soundwave said:
Again this is bullshit, he didn't get the votes. Period. End of story. There's nothing worse than a sore loser. If Hilary could manipulate votes like that here's a genius theory ... why didn't she do it in 2008? That was much, much closer, she lost to Obama by basically a hair. This contest? Wasn't even close. Even if she somehow manipulated "half" that, she still wins by like 2 million. Winning is winning. You don't give the guy who came in second at the Olympics a gold too because he was only a second behind. She lost in 2008 and won in 2016 ... fair is fair. Quite frankly good on her for sticking with it, that loss in 2008 would've crushed many people. Shows character to pick yourself up and after that, dust yourself off, and try again. |
No,if she had character, then there wouldn't be an issue with her being the presidential candidate.
Instead we have a person who won due to tricky rules not allowing the large bulk of supporters for the opposing candidate vote (which you keep discounting like it's not a big thing, when it it really is a pretty big deal that they couldn't vote). We have a presidential elect who has already been confirmed guilty of a fairly serious crime (despite the actual ramifications being next to nothing that we're aware of), yet isn't being charged because ¯_(ツ)_/¯
We've got someone who is being voted for because she's perceived as the lesser of two evils. And dude? That's fucking disgusting. We're looking forward to a pretty fucking shitty 4-8 years right now because the DNC tried their damndest to sabotage one of their candidates, and you're sitting here defending it. Opinions like yours are absolutely cancerous to the election process, because you're so concerned with picking the lesser of two evils that you never stop to think "Why don't we just pick a good one?"
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames







