Azuren said:
And Bernie was denied many independent votes in several states. Running for a Democrat is almost the only chopice he had to remain relevant, but his supporters were prevented from voting on such a massive scale that there's no way to tell if 4 million gap wouldn't have been closed or not. It would have been a much closer race. That aside, there was also the DNC bias towards Hillary and against Bernie that should honestly call for a bit of speculation on any and all numbers released by the DNC. 4 million could have very well been half that now that we know the leaders have absolutely zero integrity. |
Again this is bullshit, he didn't get the votes. Period. End of story.
There's nothing worse than a sore loser.
If Hilary could manipulate votes like that here's a genius theory ... why didn't she do it in 2008?
That was much, much closer, she lost to Obama by basically a hair. This contest? Wasn't even close. Even if she somehow manipulated "half" that, she still wins by like 2 million.
Winning is winning. You don't give the guy who came in second at the Olympics a gold too because he was only a second behind.
She lost in 2008 and won in 2016 ... fair is fair. Quite frankly good on her for sticking with it, that loss in 2008 would've crushed many people.
Shows character to pick yourself up and after that, dust yourself off, and try again.







