By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MTZehvor on 05 August 2016
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:
MTZehvor said:

Going to refer back to my third to last paragraph in the OP, which was written largely to counter the line of thinking that it was either never intended or never promised. Along with the fact that every single trailer focuses on choosing between two families, as opposed to two different gameplay systems, as well as the fact that the game forces you to make the choice with all of your siblings surrounding you and then immediately follows whatever choice you make with either Ryoma or Xander (depending on your choice) calling you a traitor (with the game's saddest track playing in the background, no less). I think the game does plenty to suggest that, at least initially, it was trying to make the choice about story more than anything else. Add that to the fact that we knew about the diverging story paths well before we even knew that they would be sold as separate games altogether, and I don't think my expectation is particularly unreasonable at all.

I will say, though, that I did anticipate a not so difficult choice when I picked up the game; just from the trailers themselves, I had a hard time picturing myself choosing Nohr. I certainly saw it coming, at least before launch date, so it's not that I'm disappointed that I bought something expecting a much deeper story. It's more of I saw something with the potential for a unique take on storytelling, and I'm disappointed that it didn't deliver. Even if you don't think that was ever the intention of the developers, I'd still argue it's disappointing that a golden opportunity to do something new with player choice wasn't capitalized on.

Considering that you had to make the choice at the point of sale (unless you bought the special edition of the game) then I'm not sure how you could have expected them to have a huge build up to a major choice. Considering how early you had to make the choice, I'm not sure what you could have expected. 

Trailers are meant to give an overview and to harp on a game's selling point.  In this case, the selling point was simply that there were two different versions of the game.  That is all.  In developer interviews, it was made clear that players should choose based on gameplay preferences.  It was never billed as a moral choice system in the same way as Mass Effect, Deus Ex, or Catherine, which you actually have control over the narrative.   It was simply "hey there are two different versions of this game".  

You actually don't have to make the choice at the point of sale. Yeah, you have to purchase either Birthright or Conquest, but the path you choose at launch is not locked in; you can still choose Conquest if you purchase Birthright as long as you're willing to pay the $20 right there (and vice versa). In other words, if you're an FE fan and plan on playing both routes, then which version you buy makes no difference besides which game box gets displayed on your shelf. Setting that to the side, though, much of my excitement was from the trailer(s) released before we even knew that it was a dual release; the decision mechanic was announced several months before we were aware that the game would be sold in two editions. It's more than reasonable to be excited about a concept billed as a difficult decision by its own trailer when the separate release thing isn't made public yet.

And I would argue that it was most certainly billed as a moral dilemma, again, considering that we were informed of the decision before we even knew it was being sold in two separate versions. It's certainly not the same kind of moral choice system that Mass Effect or Deus Ex is, but it is a choice that is at least meant to be somewhat founded in an emotional response, and the fact that that was so shallow is what disappoints me.