Is Eurogamer full of Bollocks?

[IkePoR]

Hiku said:

Wyrdness said:

They didn't corroborate nothing, they only reported on the article then contacted Nintendo for confirmation, the WSJ report was an article on what was doing the rounds. If you have a WSJ subscription I'll link the actual article so you can read it yourself it doesn't back up nothing otherwise.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/nintendo-swings-to-loss-1469604309

I don't have a subscription. I already tried the link before but couldn't read it. And no offense to you, but when several sites whose job it is to analyze these things (Gematsu, GameXplain) say the WSJ corroborated it, I'm going to take their word for it until I see proof of the opposite.
Posting the link to an article locked behind a paywall that you should assume I probably can't read doesn't do much in that regard.
I can't be sure if you've read it, and even if you have, that it's not a misinterpretation from your end. Like the MCV article where they first just reported on Eurogamers information, but later updated with a disclaimer at the bottom which changes the entire article from a simple reporting to a corroboration. "UPDATE: As there still seems to be some debate about the veracity of Eurogamer's claims, our aforementioned senior source assures us the site is "100 per cent correct"

Either way, we're having more and more sites corroborating this info through their own sources, which is making it sound very similar to the PS4 Neo situation.
The point is, it's not just Eurogamer any more.

Couldn't they all just be parroting for the same exposure that Eurogamer's currently getting?