RolStoppable said:
None of those practices from the NES days were valid anymore by the time the PS1 came around. They were gone during the SNES era already. How are they relevant then? |
Nintendo had used "tricks", as you call them, to achieve market dominance, which they still held in the SNES era. They were perfectly willing and able to run over any competitor who could not match them. They were in the catbird seat and I doubt anyone can dispute that. They had market influence, they had money, and they had brand exposure and recognition.
Had they made the right decisions, the Playstation probably would have finished second.
Heck, I remember when the N64 was expected to steamroll the PSX. Instead, cartridges were smaller and very expensive, Nintendo charged higher royalties and controlled production in Japan, and third-parties went elsewhere. It was less about what Sony did right than about what Nintendo did wrong. "Tricks" were the least of their problems.








