By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
Ganoncrotch said:

The link to the story might have been important to the original story since that guy in a bathroom is not quite a guy and not a guy in the eyes of the law which is the point you wanted to make?

The link was not important.  
The point was this guy would be legally required to use the female bathroom.  That is all.  Has nothing to do with the picture itself.  That doesn't require a story about what the picture is about.  You don't need to know the history of rock-paper-scissors to play rock-paper-scissors.   I could have used dozens of other pictures to make the same point, like these pictures:

These guys would have to use the female bathroom should that law be passed.

The link that explains the guy is in fact a woman? How do you think that doesn't matter given the text of your first post, if you think that isn't important I dare think what other information you think doesn't matter in this case alone. See the point where being overly correct with pronouns to the point where it muddles the actual issue of your first post is where it's defeating their purpose.

Anyway I'll be honest, lack of clear info, broken images to people with questions about the pictures... can't really discuss that, I'm not going off to google those people in all fairness and I can't obviously make a reply to what I think of two broken links.... unless that is what those people actually look like after some odd surgery in which case I'm not sure which bathroom they should use.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive