By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
DonFerrari said:
Well, If you hold your expectations too high you are certain to fall. And stock value doubling doesn't near mean Nintendo really is more valuable than Sony as a whole (since Sony gaming part at some points were more valuable than the whole group).

If you think like this then you would have to say Pokemon Go values just as much as Nintendo as a whole (with all the buildings, HW developed, IP owned, etc).

That's one of the biggest flaws in the concept of Market Capitalization.  Back in the Wii and DS days, Nintendo actually overtook Toyota in market cap for a while.    Total number of ourstanding stock x value per stock = a speculative notion of a company's value.

 

The real take away is that this shows massive investor interest.  The downfall is that the majority of investors are fickle, ignorant and jump on bandwagons faster than political activists on cocaine.

Yep, totally agree... but people with no knowledge will commemorate just because they see it as a good new.

BraLoD said:
This thread (and Scorpio ones) remind me of people saying Sony fans are horrible for posting how better was Sony doing stuff compared to others...

Well, that is because we are always remembered that Sony fans are the worse than all.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."