By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
AsGryffynn said:

I'd rather have a close competition with one side having an slight advantage. I just despise the idea that Google, Sony,  LG or Samsung should rule... 

I'd rather no form of lockdowna nd no defacto OS. Also what other close comeptiton has there ever been in the past 10-20 years in the OS space?. We can say Mac OS but lets be real, that's largely used by artists and isn't suited for gaming let alone being used for gaming so with that OS out of the way we are out of fresh competition for desktop OS's. 

I despite the idea of MS ruling over all...

See I know you and I have differing opinions and all that jazz but you deep down want my options, my idea of competition completely done away with because  of favouritsm. I have no favoritism, not at this point in time since the past two Windows OS's have served to oush me further away from MS. I have no such desire for MS to do away with everyone and lock us all under one OS, one API. No thanks, I'd rather the competition thrive and grow to a size where MS can never rule because the fact of the matter is, we don't ened a ruler because it shows arrogance, it shows how little choice we have when one rules over all.

I actually want Linux and the other variant being Android to grow and thrive because then those two can become suitable options for others to choose rather than being forced towards another side due to there being no choice at all, that's just bad to look at that in some positive way, there is nothing positive about being forced into something you don't like. 

Did you just read what I posted? I have zero favoritism, but MS has great track record to me. Their track record towards you might be horrible though... 

Linux has always been the meh OS to me. Apple is good enough, but has the issues that Windows and Linux don't. I hate Android and find it's easier to use Symbian than try and deal with that piece of shite...