DivinePaladin said:
I don't think you fully read my post. Reread the last sentence. I never said he WAS using any sort of critical thinking, I said that he doesn't have to be critical to have an effect. As somebody with that sort of effect on impressionable viewers, he should know better. People watch him for his gameplay and personality; it doesn't have to come with critical analysis here. If he's playing a game, like you said, people will buy it - and as somebody who was directly paid to play a game, he did need more disclosure.
I still don't think we should string the guy up and call the mob - he did disclose, just not in the ideal way - but to insinuate that he needs to be critical in order for this practice to be a problem is a bit much. |
Most of my reply wasn't aimed at you. A lot of people here are giving PDP a hard time because people "Trust" him with to deliver honest "critiques", and now that trust is gone. Wat. That's not an angle you can tackle the issue from.
Your angle, however, is valid. I don't agree with it, but it's valid. Why don't I agree? Because he disclosed, I would've read it if I watched the video, and if he didn't, no guidelines would've been broken either way. Not to mention, In later videos, he did those type of diclosures better and in a more obvious way, he followed the newly released guidelines period. Shouldn't we give him props for that?