torok said:
Why people are using Metacritic instead of Rotten Tomatoes? While Meta is fine for games, its scores are usually ridiculously bad for movies. Rotten Tomatoes is way more accurate. |
Rotten Tomatoes is actually a poor source, as they only use positive versus negative. So a movie could be getting 6s across the board (not sure where they actually draw the positive line) but have a really high fresh rating.
Lawlight said:
Mike_L said:
So what I'm getting is that some are outraged because they believe this movie's sole purpose is to be a platform for gender politics. If that's true I see why they don't want to see the movie, I guess. But just don't watch it then. If enough people ignore it a similar thing is less likely to happen again.
Though, I find it odd that many seem to be willing to give it a try when it releases on blu-ray and streaming services. If you're certain that it's nothing more than a platform for gender politics why would you even be interested in ever watching it? Because it actually may be more than just gender politics?
Some of you refuse to believe the reviewers even though they actually HAVE seen the movie and genuinely liked it.
I don't understand that but that's not a first. I'm often confused as to why some people seem to have a problem with everything.
|
I don't think the reviewers are genuine. How would you know if they are.
|
Simple. If they spend part of the review bashing detractors as bigoted, sexist trolls, they have an agenda to push and their review shouldn't count. Like the one in the OP.
