The "30fps campaign, 60fps multiplayer" approach

[Conina]

torok said:

Conina said:

Counting only PS4 gamers instead of all Playstation gamers (PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PSP, PS Vita) is also a biased number with this argumentation. Everyone playing those PS4 games will have a better hardware than PS3 because if they didn't they would not be able to play it.

A bit of a stretch, isn't it? As I said,even considering the subset of users you are proposing, you can't guarantee they will run the game at 60 fps, which is the initial question of the whole discussion.

I don't guarantee that they will run the game at 60 fps... I even am quite sure that many of them won't have solid 60 fps and I don't agree with Running_Matt's statement that 60 fps are minimum for PC gamers.

My main points are that the PC community is too diverse to find any "average group" within them and that the current Steam stats are a bad basis for diskussions about what percentage of players of a game will hit 60 fps and how much wont.