Aquamarine said:
You're correct. For those who are confused, it's like this:
Nintendo directly owns 32% of the Pokemon Company Nintendo owns 35% of Creatures Inc. -> Creatures Inc. owns 32% of The Pokemon Company -> Nintendo indirectly owns 11% of The Pokemon Company = Nintendo owns 43% of The Pokemon Company directly and indirectly
30% of revenues from Pokemon Go go to The Pokemon Company, so Nintendo indirectly benefits from 13% of revenues of Pokemon Go (but they'll most likely just get reinvested into Pokemon) In addition, an extra 10% of revenues go directly to Nintendo = Therefore, Nintendo benefits from 23% of revenues in total, excluding their small share in Niantic and the dividends they may accrue. |
I also have an estimate as to the share that Nintendo owns of Niantic.
In a Feb. 25 Series A venture financing round, Niantic valued itself at $150 million.
So the $20 million that Google + Pokemon + Nintendo put into the company would theoretically imply a combined equity value of 13.33% assuming the same valuation.
Let's assume that the equity in the $20 million in Series A Funding from The Pokemon Company, Google, Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd. was evenly distributed.
Therefore:
$6.7 million -> Nintendo's investment in Niantic -> 4.44% Nintendo's Equity in Niantic
$6.7 million -> The Pokemon Company's investment in Niantic -> 4.44% Pokemon's Equity -> 1.91% Nintendo's Indirect Equity in Niantic (because Nintendo owns 43% of The Pokemon Company)
$6.7 million -> Google's investment in Niantic -> 4.44% Equity in Niantic
=
So in theory, Nintendo could own 6.4% of Niantic directly and indirectly.







