Gnizmo said: shio said: StarcraftManiac said: shio said: Those specs aren't confirmed. It could very well be false, which probably is.
And if it's true, then those are very, very low specs. Should run on 6 year old PC's when it comes out. |
Eehrm... The high-end specs are pretty sick if you ask me... Requires an expensive set-up And, it's kinda odd that an RTS has such high specs... But hey, if I can play it I honestly don't care! ... |
Eh?? If those specs are true, then you can run Starcraft 2 on a $200 PC today, play recommended settings on a $350 PC, and play high settings on a $450 PC Today, let alone when it comes out. Griffin said: Those seem pretty high, they are Crysis type requirements. |
What is with you people? |
For a Blizzard game those requirements are kinda high. I wouldn't be surprised to see them drop down a bit or these turn out to be false just because Blizzard likes to have their games run on a 5 year old toaster. They are very reasonable specs for a typical PC game though. |
how are they high? The specs are even lower than what alot of games are coming with out today, let alone when SC2 comes out.
Seriously, if all you need to play is a Geforce 7 card, then you could even play with 5 year old GPUs (it won't though, because of lack of support of newer shaders and such)
My brother's 5 year old PC should be able to play it if it's true (gonna be 6 years old when SC2 is released, probably)